Medved: McCutcheon Means More Money, More Incumbent Protection

By Neal McNamara | April 11, 2014
Winter Weather Washington

In response to the Supreme Court’s McCutcheon decision striking down aggregate limits on donations to political candidates, liberals decry the collapse of campaign finance reforms from the post-Watergate era of the 1970’s.

But these laments never acknowledge that if these rules are meant to lessen the influence of money on politics, then they have failed completely: campaigns raise and spend vastly more money than 40 years ago, much of it by shadowy “independent” PACs designed to circumvent idiotic campaign finance limitations.

Moreover, the current system protects incumbents against serious challengers by making it harder for newcomers to raise money. Before the “reforms” incumbents outraised challengers by a margin of 3 to 2, but today they raise and spend four times as much as their challengers. It’s no wonder that Congressional elections now see incumbents winning more than 95 percent of the time!

comments powered by Disqus
Top stories

KTTH-Gun-Control-Debate-300x150


Don't miss

Don't miss

Real Estate Corner
  • Robin's Real Estate Reality Talk
    Robin's Real Estate Reality Talk We are in a very unique market. Right now our area is showing signs of recovery. We are moving in a positive direction and gaining equity though are ways off from where we were in 2006 and 2007.